DELUSION OF THE DELUDED

In the laboratories and corridors of the Physical Sciences, it a the general accepted rule that the world as we have it might have been formed out of an explosion of some sort leading to the bringing to being of the Universe. Mainly popularised as the 'Big Bang'. Of coarse this still remains hypothetical since a recent attempt to prove this science using a multi billion collider was unsuccessful. I my candid believe, I view the theory as more of a philosophy then a Science, since it flouts all the rules and fundamentals of the logic of Science. " Nothing can come out of nothing"

In today's world several effort are being made by both Naturalists and Atheists alike to exclude God out of the business of creation and in so doing ends up flouting their own principles. And of coarse the fundamentals of logic and reasoning. Theories of evolution and studies in Paleo-anthropology will rather have us believe everything in our world happened by Chance. A believe that was very much fuelled by Darwinism and his postulations on natural selection. But perhaps Darwin did get it wrong or perhaps Science has got it all wrong?

1. If you take any physical quantity in this world and section it. You will never find the reason for its existence in itself. However sectioned, however sliced, will ultimately point to a cause outside itself. Nothing can cause itself to exist.

2. Whenever you see intelligibility and specified complexity especially in the nature of language and abstract reasoning, you will always assume an intelligence behind it. You will never look at a sonnet by Shakespeare and assume a group of monkeys pounding on some typewriter or some computer produced it. Nor look at a dictionary and say, it could have developed from an explosion in the Printing Press. Never! Whenever you see intelligibility or a specified complexity, you always assume and intelligence behind it. If you were to walk unto a planet totally foreign to you, and saw one million pebbles in a perfect triangle, you can reasonably say it happened over fifteen billion years or it just came together. You can assume that. But if you found one piece of paper on the same platform that said,” hello John, I hope you brought some Indian recipes with you”. Would you for even one solitary moment think fifteen billion has put that sentence together?

To tell the truth, you are looking at language, you are looking at sense. When a Space Ship blows up, we say “what went wrong?” No one hears the simple words of a Child “Mummy” or a simple “I love you” will think for a moment it is a random collocation of atoms uttering to you some unfathomable mysteries.

I hope, I can not be accused of being an agnostist when I state that the mystries of this universe are beyond comprehension. Its of no little surprise that Astronomy has as yet not been able to unravel it mystries. And all it does is to describe it. Need I mention that description does not equate understanding. One can easily describe a phenomena but can fail to grasp its origin and meaning. And that is the accomplishment of the Physical Science.